Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Access Microbiology ; 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-20244687

ABSTRACT

<strong>BACKGROUND</strong> The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has exposed the chinks in the armour of healthcare systems and has single-handedly literally brought the world to a standstill. Diagnostic testing for COVID-19 is critical for understanding epidemiology, contract-tracing, case management, and to control the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2. RT-PCR test, the gold standard test, involves fairly complex steps and take nearly 24–48 h for generating the results. GeneXpert is a rapid nucleic-acid-detection-based test approved by ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research), which can shorten the turnaround time significantly.AIMThe aim of the study was to compare the performance of GeneXpert against the gold standard RT-PCR for SARS-COV-2. <strong>MATERIALS AND METHODS</strong> This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care centre from 25th March 2020 to 8th December 2020. The Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swabs that were sent to the Covid laboratory for testing of SARS COV-2 by GeneXpert (CBNAAT) were included for the study. The samples that gave a positive result were simultaneously tested for rRT-PCR. According to the manufacturer instructions, the cut-off value for GeneXpert is 45 whereas according to ICMR, cut-off value for RT-PCR to be taken is 35.RESULTSOut of 220 samples positive by GeneXpert , 102 (46%) showed negative results by RT-PCR. Among these 102 samples, 89% (91/102) samples were found to be positive by GeneXpert with Ct value >35 whereas 90% (96/107) positive GeneXpert samples had Ct value <35 which were also positive by RT-PCR. <strong>CONCLUSION</strong> The formulation of certain cut-off Ct values for the uniform results by both GeneXpert and RT-PCR should be implemented.

2.
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology ; 45:100391, 2023.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-20231043

ABSTRACT

Purpose Multiple variants of SARS-CoV-2 from Alpha to Omicron have an estimated 6.1 million deaths globally till date. These variants have been found to vary in transmissibility and severity. The present study deals with comparison of morbidity and mortality with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants. Materials and method An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted on a cohort of laboratory confirmed patients of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed by qRT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swabs in periods;April-2021 and January-2022;that were sequenced and variants were recorded. Patients were invited for a telephonic interview after voluntary and informed consent was obtained from each participant wherein, the demographics, co-morbidities, oxygen requirement and mortality outcomes of the patients were enquired about. Results A total of 200 patients, with 100 from each period were included in the study. Major comorbidities in patients included hypertension, diabetes mellitus and pulmonary disease. Patients who succumbed to the Delta variant (26%) were higher as compared to the Omicron variant (10%);with the elderly (68 ​± ​9.7 ​years) having significant mortality during the Omicron variant. The mortality was increased in patients with comorbidities as with hypertension (53.8%, 70%), diabetes mellitus (26.9%, 40%), chronic pulmonary disease (30.8%, 20%), and smoking (15.4%, 40%) in the patients infected with both Delta and Omicron variants, respectively. Conclusion The study concluded that the newer strains of SARS-CoV-2 have potential of high transmissibility and milder disease for the population by large, however, for patients with comorbidities have a higher proportion of adverse outcomes, irrespective of the variant.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL